Skip to content

Iceland, June 2023

Thursday 13 July 2023

Iceland: the land of fire and ice. To photographers, this rock in the North Atlantic is a gem. Simply put, there are more dynamic and engaging natural landscapes and photo ops per square kilometre in Iceland than anywhere else I’ve travelled. And most importantly, they are accessible by car and/or a short walk or hike.

Brúarfoss under a dreary sky
Brúarfoss under a dreary sky. There are a hundred photos waiting to be captured here! Is it really that blue? Yes, most definitely!
OM-1 w/ M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm F4.0 IS PRO at 14mm (28mm efov); f/4.5 @ ¼; ISO 200; Circular Polarizing filter; EV–⅓; Live ND mode used to blur motion in the water

Iceland’s raw beauty is the result of plate tectonics and volcanoes producing masses of lava—a new fissure is erupting as I write this—the constant grinding by massive glaciers flowing down mountain valleys, and the relentless flow of numerous rivers, sculpting cliff faces and scouring broad flood plains. For photographers, these forces create evocative and evolving landscapes of contrasting colours, shapes and patterns.

Gullfoss on the Hvítá
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 16mm (32mm efov); f/8 @ 1 second; ISO 200; EV–⅓; Live ND mode
“Gull” = golden; “foss” = waterfall; “á” = river. Therefore, this is the Golden Waterfall on the River Hvít

Ancient azure blue glacial ice leaps from the rich, blacks sands of eroded lava. Bright snow or blue sky contrasts with the soft reds, oranges and ochres of lava charged with iron and sulphur compounds. Emerald green grasses and mosses cling to beds of brown-black lava soils, punctuated with blazes of pink and yellow summer wildflowers. Brilliant white water cascades carve chasms into cliffs and gorges, spilling out over the landscape in the ever-changing ribbons of braided streams and rivers. Now, add to those scenes some stocky Icelandic horses, a pure and ancient hardy breed with their long, wind-blown manes, and some woolly white and black Icelandic sheep—ideal for anyone with a camera; an endless paradise for the die-hard landscape photographer.

Details along the trail, Reykjadalur

In June 2023, I was the trip lead for a group of 30 energetic teens, 3 chaperones, and our Evolve Tours guide for 7 very full days of touring and hiking the most commonly visited places in Iceland. The overnight flight from Toronto landed at Keflavík at 6:30am local time, which is 2:30am Toronto time. But, as you do when travelling, you hit the ground running.


Photo Tip: While on the flight to Iceland, keep an eye out for the dramatic mountains and glaciers of Greenland on the north (left) side of the plane. In the summer months, with the Midnight Sun of the Arctic, the light will be warm, even dawn-like. You may find it worth selecting a window seat on that side, typically seat “A” or, for the homeward flight, seat “F”, preferably ahead of the wing. As with everything photographic, there is no guarantee the weather will co-operate.


I did this same trip six years previously with a school group, as well as travelling for two spectacular weeks in March a few years ago with my wife, Laura. She’s travelled to Iceland an additional 2 or 3 times herself. Can you tell we love Iceland?

Basalt pillars and cave, Reynisfjara black sand beach
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 16mm (32mm efov); f/5.6 @ 1/60; ISO 200; EV 0

Still bleary-eyed from the the flight, we wolfed down some breakfast at the bus, then we were off to see the sights of the Golden Circle Route: the tectonic fissures and historical setting of Þingviller National Park; the hot steam jets of Geysir, and the largest waterfall in Europe, by volume, Gullfoss. This, along with the “Waterfall Route”, which we did on Day 3, (Skógafoss and Seljandsfoss) are the most frequently-visited places in Iceland as they are all within day-trip distance of Reykjavik.

Waterfall in the Mist: Skogafoss
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 16mm (32mm efov); f/9 @ ⅛; ISO 200; EV–1⅓; Live ND mode
Reducing the amount of sky in the composition, then adding a sky mask during editing allowed me to bring some definition back to the clouds

Our first base, though, was a guesthouse south of Selfoss, about an hour southeast of Reykjavík along Highway 1, the Ring Road or Hringvegur. This gave us the freedom to backtrack slightly to visit the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant and hike out to the Reykjadalur hot springs on Day 2


Photo Tip: Phones, watches and tablets automatically update to different time zones; most cameras do not. Before landing, take a moment to set your camera to the time and date of your destination. Iceland is GMT 0 and, with nearly 24 hours of daylight in the summer, it does not observe Daylight Savings Time or Summer Time.


One of the difficulties with Iceland is the weather. Be prepared for the worst—overcast, rain and wind—and hope for better. Icelanders will tell you, “If you don’t like the weather, wait five minutes”, an allusion to how variable it is. The problem is there can be days of overcast skies with light to heavy rain, sometimes calm and sometimes windy. This is what we experienced for most of our trip, counting the sunshine in minutes. In fact, we cancelled our day on Heimaey, in the Vestmannaeyjar Islands due to constant rain and near gale force winds. The ferry trip, alone, would have done us in.

Seljandsfoss
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 16mm (32mm efov); f/9 @ ⅛; ISO 200; EV–1⅓; Live ND mode
Yes, another dreary day. This took some careful editing in Lightroom to separate sky and falling water.

As a photographer, what to do? As I said, prepare for the worst and hope for something better. “Preparation” takes two forms: mentally and physically. If you go to Iceland expecting the weather to co-operate, to provide you with dramatic blue skies mixed with soft, golden sunshine, you will likely be frustrated. Those days do happen, more so in summer than at any other time of year, but be mentally prepared to adjust your expectations.

Consider changing your schedule to better fit the weather or change the nature of your shooting. Reduce the amount of sky in your landscapes, concentrating more on colour contrasts, shapes and natural details. Consider also the details: those “blazes of pink and yellow wildflowers” pop with rain drops against the bright green grasses and mosses and dark lava soils.


Photo Tip: With overcast skies, isolate portions of waterfalls against the dark volcanic rock. Expose carefully then check for highlight clipping on your LCD; adjust as needed and shoot again. When you include an overcast sky, again, carefully check for highlight clipping and reduce exposure accordingly. Alternatively, use HDR techniques to capture the full tonal range. Either way, with some post-capture masking and editing, overcast skies can be tamed to enhance the contrast.


The other aspect of preparing for rain is the physical aspect of protecting equipment. My colleague on the trip used light plastic rain protectors which worked okay, but they also flapped around in the wind. A heavier, tighter fitting rain cover may have solved the issue. I chose to go au natural, and am pleased to report that the weather sealing of my OM System gear is excellent, though I also took precautions.

Portrait: Icelandic Horse
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 28mm (56mm efov); f/8 @ 1/100; ISO 200; EV–1⅓

Another key piece of equipment you’ll need, rain or shine, is a soft, lint-free, absorbent cloth to wipe down your gear, especially the front filter or lens element. Wind and waterfalls, and sometimes just waterfalls, will ensure you and your gear will get a thorough soaking. At Gullfoss and Skógafoss the spray is relentless, and at Seljandsfoss, it’s completely unavoidable as you walk and climb behind the waterfall. If you make it to Gljúfrabúi, the hidden waterfall near Seljandsfoss, you and your gear will be thoroughly soaked.

My third rain prep suggestion is about your camera strap. Expecting I would be in a fleece and raincoat most of the time (which proved correct!), I switched my usual neck strap for a “quick draw” shoulder harness. This meant the camera could easily be tucked under my right arm, zipped inside my raincoat when necessary, but always be ready-to-go in an instant. That shoulder harness is the best $25 I’ve ever spent on photography. Even better is how easily I can unscrew the strap from the tripod socket to free-hold the camera, my other favourite way of shooting.

Blue Diamond, Breiðamerkursandur
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 18mm (36mm efov); f/8 @ ½; ISO 200; EV+1; Live ND mode

I’m often asked about what lenses to bring when travelling. Previously, I used a Sony RX-10iii that covered 24mm to 600mm with a beautiful Zeiss lens and a 1″ sensor. It was a great travel camera that I can highly recommend. More recently, I’ve moved into the OM System, specifically chosen for its high quality and portability.

The OM-1 and my kit of three high-quality zooms covering the full frame equivalent of 16mm to 800mm all fit into a small sling pack weighing about 4kg (less than 10 pounds). So I bring everything. However, during this most recent trip, I used my 12-100mm/4 (24-200mm efov) almost exclusively, only exchanging it for my 100-400 (200-800mm efov) to capture close-ups of a seal in Jökulsárlón glacial lagoon. If there had been puffins or other seabirds, the 100-400 would have seen more use. If the weather and timing were on my side, and I wasn’t herding 30 teens, I would have made better use of my 8-25mm/4 (16-50mm efov) zoom to create more dramatic landscape shots.

Þórsmörk between showers.
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 12mm (24mm efov); f/5.6 @ 1/500; ISO 800; EV–⅔
It was so windy on the top of this “hill” I had no choice but to increase the ISO to get a fast enough shutter speed!

In our seven days, we covered a lot of ground and did a lot of hiking. A few commercial “extras” we included in the trip were:

  • A tour of a lava tunnel at Raufarhólshellir. It was educational but not ideal for photographers due to the short time in the tunnel;
  • Taking an amphibious craft out onto Jokülsárlón glacial lagoon where we got close up to brilliant blue icebergs and a seal;
  • A glacier hike on Sólheimajökull glacier; great for black and whites with a touch of blue. I preferred our glacier hike on Svínafellsjökull years ago with its more dramatic location, though I understand it has retreated significantly;
  • A popular hiking destination, but one that requires 4×4 vehicles (we had a 4×4 coach!) is Þórsmörk. The image above gives a sense of the outstanding and dramatic beauty of this extensive wilderness area. The road in is loose gravel, “organized” each year into a semblance of a road after the spring runoff. I lost count of the number of river crossings the coach had to make as there are no bridges in this region. Surprisingly, there is public bus service into the Þórsmörk region, but you need to be prepared for wilderness.
  • On our last school trip, we visited Landmannalaugar, an equally spectacular wilderness region that also requires a 4×4 vehicle for access.
  • The Blue Lagoon; very expensive, but it’s what they wanted!
Coastline at Dyrhólaey
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 15mm (30mm efov); f/5.6 @ 1/125; ISO 200; EV 0
Only the blue of the Atlantic Ocean and a hint of green on the distant slopes provide colour to an otherwise surreal and desolate landscape.

There are a few favourite places that I am looking forward to getting back to for more serious photography:

Brúarfoss is the spectacular glacial-blue-water waterfall just east of Laugarvatn, on the Golden Circle. With a new road and parking area, this place will soon become inundated with Instagrammers.

Breiðamerkursandur, also called Fellsfjara, is the black sand “Diamond Beach” across the Ring Road from Jokülsárlón glacial lagoon. It is here that icebergs large and small wash ashore, having calved off from Breiðamerkurjökull glacier and floated through Jokülsárlòn. As a photographer, you can well-imagine the photographic potential of combining clear, white, and blue ice with black sand and gravel. Add the waves piling in from the North Atlantic, and you have a few hours of photo riches to discover and create.

The same is true at Reynisfjara black sand beach near Vík, but here you need to be extra cautious of rogue waves which are known to sweep tourists away. Seriously!! The basalt columns along the shore and the various eroded cave features create another treasure trove of interesting photos.

These are just a few of the many dozens-hundreds of photo ops available to anyone with a creative eye who can work with the weather and the colours, shapes and patterns of the various landscape elements to create truly engaging photographs. Iceland really is a land made for landscape and nature photographers.

On ice: Harbour Seal, Joküllsárlón
OM-1 w/M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS at 400mm (800mm efov); f/6.3 @ 1/1250; ISO 1000; EV 0. The internal stabilization of the lens and camera combined to make these shots possible with an 800mm field of view on a rolling boat.

A few tips if you are thinking of visiting . . .

Since I was with a school group, we did a coach tour. Our personal trips have all been self-drive. If you’re thinking about Iceland, I strongly advise booking a rental car and BnBs or guesthouses and spending a week or more. There is more than enough spectacular scenery and experiences to see and photograph without a four-wheel-drive. Even in March we rented a small car and had little trouble touring the north of the island. The roads were no worse than our Canadian roads in winter.

A car gives you the flexibility to stay longer at places when the shooting is good or move on (or hide out in) during bad weather. You can start as early in the day as you like and keep shooting ‘til midnight. Oh, and if you’re there in the summer, don’t go looking for the Aurora borealis! Icelanders turn them off until the fall, when the sky is dark enough at night to see them. It’s a way of promoting tourism in the off-season.

Meals out can be expensive, but once you realize taxes are already in the price and tipping is not a thing in Iceland (everyone earns a decent wage there), the prices aren’t too far off any touristy place. Save yourself some coin by shopping at Bonús, and make at least some of your meals at your BnB. Some Icelandic foods you really must try include Kjötsúpa, a lamb and vegetable soup similar to Scotch broth; Plokkfiskur, a traditional fish and potato stew; and their amazing liquorice ice cream—in fact all their ice cream is phenomenal! There’s a gas station near Svínafellsjökull Glacier in Vatnajökull National Park that has a great cafeteria with Icelandic food called Veitingasala Restaurant, Shop and Gas—highly recommended.

The Toe: Sólheimajoküll
OM-1 w/12-100mm/4 at 57mm (114mm efov); f/4 @ 1/80; ISO 200; EV–⅓
The black is ash from the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in 2010.

When we travel to Iceland ourselves (without students), we find the BnB/guesthouse experience far more enriching and flexible. We book in central locations (Selfoss, Laugarvatn, Kirkjubæjarklaustur, Vík, Ólafsvík, etc.). We stay a few nights at each location, and explore from there. A great way to finish the day is by going to a local geothermally-heated pool with hot tubs. They are typically outdoors—a wonderful experience when it’s snowing in March! The commercial hot springs—Sky Lagoon, Hidden Lagoon and Blue Lagoon—are lovely but very expensive. However, a 1-hour-hike up Reykjadalur (near Hveragerði) will take you to a natural hot spring, for free, as are the numerous other natural hot springs around the country.

In fact, be wary when you visit Iceland travel websites. You will be bombarded with commercial experiences that cost $100 to $800 or more. In reality, all of the outdoor landscape and walking/hiking experiences are free, other than the cost to park your vehicle (about $10/day at a National Park) and some toilet facilities (by card or coin, $1 to $3 per use).

The culture in Iceland is rich and ancient. The landscapes breathtaking. And the people are warm, forthright and confident, thoughtful and creative. Mass tourism in Iceland is still a relatively new phenomenon, so don’t get upset if you are told off for stopping at the side of the road for a photo or worse, pulling into someone’s farm lane. They don’t appreciate roadside pees either. And watch your speed! 90km/h is 90km/h, not 100 or 110 like it is here in Canada. The roads are narrow enough without having a wide-eyed tourist driving with only half an eye on the road while scouting for just the right spot for a photo. Most importantly, once you return home, begin planning a second trip because once is never enough!

Further Reading and Planning (and Dreaming!)

Caveat: Like every travel website, the photos shown on these and many other websites show each location at its best. Many photos have also been shot with drones, which are not permitted in popular travel areas and national parks without a special permit. Weather is also highly variable in Iceland and can be used to your advantage in photography , but it can also be disappointingly rainy at the wrong time.

  • Iceland Travel: Scenic Routes in Iceland – This is the official travel website of the Iceland government. I like it because the maps and info are very helpful and there are no ads screaming for attention as with so many commercial sites. We visited the Golden Circle route and the South Coast route. I can also highly recommend Snæfellsnes and the North, though really, you can go anywhere and be astonished at the beauty.
  • Lonely Planet: Iceland – My second go-to site for Iceland newbies
  • Iceland Weather: Your phone may have weather showing right on the Home Screen, and while it may be accurate most of the time and in your home country, it may not be accurate locally in Iceland. The Iceland weather service has a much more reliable website and phone app, which also includes earthquake and avalanche updates.
  • SafeTravel.is is a website and phone app designed to provide you with local updates to help keep you safe. It is particularly helpful if you are self-driving.
  • Vatnajökull National Park covers an extensive part of the south coast with many viewpoints and glaciers accessible by “easy” half- and full-day hikes. Skaftafellsstofa Visitors Centre is a great place to start with the well-interpreted Glacier Trail and the Svartifoss Trail. Further east is Fellsfjara black sand “Diamond” beach with icebergs washed up from Jökulsárlón glacial lagoon, where tours of the lagoon are available (for a fee) on an amphibious craft, a zodiac, or by kayak.
  • Drone Use in Iceland – Although a commercial website, it has the most complete set of rules and regulations. Note that additional rules will be implemented “soon” to comply with EU rules regarding registration of drones and pilot training. You will need to register at flydrone.is and pay the ISK 5,500 (CAD 60) fee.

Notes:

  1. efov: Equivalent Field of View for a full-frame digital camera or 35mm film camera.
    The advantage of the smaller Micro Four-Thirds sensors is that an Olympus 400mm lens captures the same field of view as an 800mm lens on a full-frame camera. This means size and weight are greatly reduced and the handling of long lenses and image stabilisation are far superior.
  2. All images are saved as RAW files then are processed using Lightroom Mobile and Lightroom Classic. Jpegs out of the camera just don’t cut it with me. I have never met an image that doesn’t benefit from some thoughtful post-capture processing; it’s the equivalent of breathing life back into a machine image.

Thanks for reading!

If you have any questions or comments about Iceland, M43s photography, OM System, efov, raw capture, editing or anything else, please add it to the Comments section.

If you are not yet a subscriber, then consider adding your email so you are instantly alerted to new blog posts. And I promise not to inundate your inbox.

Have a look at my work by visiting www.luxBorealis.com and consider booking a presentation or workshop for your Photo Club or a personal field and/or screen workshop at Workshops.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

The Myth and Reality of Small Sensor Noise

Saturday 22 April 2023

Is noise a real or imagined problem? How well can noise be ‘cleaned up’ whether it’s necessary or not?

As you know, I have ventured into the realm of small sensor photography, having traded in my Nikon full frame system for the OM Systems OM-1 (formerly Olympus) camera body and lenses. With a smaller sensor comes the concern, real or imagined, of greater noise, especially at higher ISO settings. And we all know, more noise translates into poorer quality photographs. So why would I bother with a small sensor camera?

Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe) with nesting material, The Arboretum, University of Guelph, Ontario
OM-1 w M. Zuiko Digital 100-400mm ƒ5.0-6.3 IS at 400mm; ƒ6.3 @ 1/2000; ISO1600

Small sensor pros. Any cons?

The OM-1 comes packed with 20.2 million pixels on a sensor that is ¼ the size of a full frame sensor. At this pixel density, if it were a full frame camera, the sensor would be about 80mp, something Sony and Canon have yet to achieve. The smaller Micro Four Thirds sensor is why a 100mm lens on an OM-1 gives the same field of view as a 200mm lens on a full frame camera. Small sensor = shorter focal lengths = smaller lenses = less weight in my sling pack, which is why I traded in my Nikon full frame for the OM system.

However, each of those 5184 x 3888 pixels is smaller in size than the pixels on, for example, a 46mp full frame camera like Nikon’s Z9. Each pixel (or photo receptor) on the OM-1 sensor is 3.36 microns in size; for the Nikon Z9, it’s 4.35 microns. Being 2 microns smaller, the photo receptors on the OM-1 cannot gather as much light per exposure. Therefore, the “gain” needed to boost the signal from the sensor to the digital file is higher, resulting in more noise. At least that’s the theory, but does it bear out in actual practice?

Early Magnolia, The Arboretum, University of Guelph, Ontario
OM-1 w/100-400mm ƒ5.0-6.3; ƒ11 @ 1/200; ISO400

As the Grinch complained, “Noise! Noise! Noise!”

In theory – noise! However, the reality is that the noise level of files from the OM-1 is truly impressive. In fact, it is so good, I find myself examining photos at 200% for noise and sharpness, rather than at 100%. And, when printed, any noise visible on screen disappears, even at ISO 1600. Moreover, Mike Lane, a British wildlife photographer, is so impressed with the noise on his OM-1, he uses ISO 1600 as his base ISO. I remember the days (okay, old man) of pushing ISO 400 Tri-X black and white film two stops to ISO 1600 and having to deal with the salt and pepper results of grain on top of grain. Well, not anymore!

The engineers at Olympus, and subsequently OM Systems, have built some advanced electronics into the camera to deal with noise, including 3 analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). These are the electronics that boost the signal from the photo receptors before being written to a file. Each ADC is optimised for a different ISO range: ISO 200 to 800; ISO 1000 to 12800; and ISO 16000 and above.

Incredible. Now, I will admit up front that I have not tested these ranges. Rather, my findings are based on actual usage in the field. Here are my findings using photos shot at ISO 3200.

I can honestly report that noise is more visible on files from the OM-1 than files from my D800E, BUT . . . and this is an important but . . . the noise is neither objectionable, nor noticeable, except at 200% viewing on screen – and this is the issue. If it takes pixel peeping at 200% to see noise, then it really is a non-issue. 95% (or more) of photos taken are destined to be viewed on a screen and NOT at 100%. A whole photo online is often at values of 10%, 25% or maybe 50% for the largest screens. As an example, my 16.2″ MacBook Pro has a resolution of 3456 x 2234 pixels or about 7.7mp. A full-sized photo would be viewed at about 38% of its actual size. The photos you see here are downsized to 1200 pixels on the longest dimension. Definitely no noise at that size! So noise is a non-issue.

Brown Creeper (Certhia americana), The Arboretum, University of Guelph, Ontario
OM-1 w/100-400mm ƒ5.0-6.3 @ 400mm; ƒ6.3 @ 1/800; ISO3200; EV-⅔
Other than the jpeg artefacts from the conversion and downsizing, the noise visible at 200% is simply not in this image. Below is a 100% crop of the same ORF as processed in Lightroom.
Brown Creeper (Certhia americana), The Arboretum, University of Guelph, Ontario
OM-1 w/100-400mm ƒ5.0-6.3 @ 400mm; ƒ6.3 @ 1/800; ISO3200; EV-⅔
Other than the jpeg artefacts from the conversion and downsizing, the noise visible at 200% is simply not visible in this image. Below is a 100% crop of the same ORF as processed in Lightroom without the new IA Denoise. You can begin to see the grain (it is ISO 3200, after all), but it is completely within the normal parameters of image viewing.

The noise issue, or non-issue

The problem is that noise has been made into an issue by internet pixel peepers who unrealistically view images at 100% and 200%, then make grandiose statements about noise. But what about large prints?

The other 5% (or less) of images are printed either in books or as photographic prints and enlargements. Once again, noise is a non-issue. In any print up to 11×14″ (which would cover all books and about 95% of all wall-hung prints), noise is not a factor. Not in the least. If you absolutely need to, image files can be up-rezzed before printing. For prints larger than 16×20″ noise becomes a factor only amongst the pixel peepers. In fact, wedding and portrait photographer Joseph Ellis makes prints up to 2’x3′ “even without much care or thought to the process”.

Even as far back as 2018, there was no recognisable difference between large prints made with full frame and Micro Four Thirds cameras (see Full Frame vs Micro 4:3 – Where It Matters Most). Why? It’s the content of the photograph that matters, not the noise. It has long been recognized that the only people who really pay any attention to noise on prints or in files are pixel peeping photographers, not clients. Clients are taken in by the emotional response they have with the content of a photograph. So, across the board, professional photographers using Micro Four Thirds sensor cameras are in no way disadvantaged by the pixel dimensions or the noise of their images.

Spring Willows, Wellington, County, Ontario
OM-1 w/M. Zuiko Digital 12-100mm ƒ4 IS PRO at 100mm; ƒ8 @ 1/160; ISO200; EV-⅓

Topaz, DxO, OM Workspace – What to do?

Before switching to an OM Systems camera and lenses, I had to think long and hard about the issue of noise and sensor size. Coming from full frame, I had “drunk the Kool-Aid” regarding the limits to small sensors. Furthermore, I like big prints. So, I spent a lot of time reading articles and viewing videos about the use of Topaz DeNoise AI, DxO PureRaw, and DxO PhotoLab, almost to the point of ordering one of them to safeguard my small sensor files against noise.

Upon purchasing my OM-1 I was pleased to learn OM Workspace (OMW) – their proprietary raw editing app – had AI Noise Reduction. Problem solved? Yes. OMW’s AI Noise Reduction and Sharpening modules worked their magic, beautifully eliminating noise while maintaining sharpness.

Waning Moon, Morning
OM-1 w/100-400mm ƒ5.0-6.3; ƒ6.3 @ 1/125; ISO 200

Initially, my only concern was that my 20mp raw files bloated to 60+mp 16-bit TIFF files, as TIFFs were the only way to export the improvements back to Lightroom for further processing. Then, I began to discover that shadow recovery in TIFF files is very poor compared to what I can do with raw files. And worse, the shadow recovery in OM Workspace, prior to exporting as a TIFF, was rudimentary at best. Combine this with a lack of Auto Black Point and Auto White Point adjustments, and my initial positive impressions of OMW waned, so the hunt for a better process continued.

Both Topaz and DxO were very tempting alternatives, mostly to avoid using large 16-bit TIFF files from OMW, and maintain a raw workflow. But which one should I order? DxO Raw was most tempting simply because I did not need a whole processing suite as I was already using Lightroom. In the end, I’m glad I didn’t place that order, as Lightroom has come through – in spades.

Lightroom does it again!

In the most recent Lightroom update, 12.3 (also for Adobe Camera Raw), Adobe introduced AI DeNoise. Anyone who has even the slightest concern about noise can now sleep easy as the quality of the images using this new technology is stunningly good. Furthermore, there is absolutely no need for any other noise reduction software. Right-click on an image, choose Enhance > DeNoise, and 40 seconds later (at least on my MacBookPro), I have a DNG file that exudes realistic de-noised smoothness while maintaining pinpoint sharpness in all the right places.

ISO3200 at 200%. We really pixel peeping here!
Although ISO 3200 poses no real noise problem in screen viewing and for prints,
it cleans up beautifully, smoothly, and naturally with Lightroom’s new AI Denoise enhancement.

I’ve always believed in Lightroom and have often wondered why photographers used other apps in addition to LR. I realize “different strokes for different folks”, but to often it seems, people think more is better. For my purposes at least, there is no other photo processing app on the market allows me to:

  • catalogue my tens of thousands of image and call up any one or group of images so quickly, by keyword, date, camera, lens, location, etc.
  • process each image or batch of images, with key adjustments of Auto Black Point and Auto White Point along with highly tailored Shadow and Highlight adjustments, plus Exposure, Contrast, Texture, Clarity, Dehaze, etc. In fact, I have re-processed raw files and jpegs from 20+ years ago using today’s much updated processing engine, and have seen marked improvement to what I had thought was a pretty darn good photograph;
  • create beautifully toned black-and-white images, just like I was back in the darkroom, but with much greater precisions and repeatability;
  • create highly detailed masks and graduated masks for accurately shaping the lighting of photographs, and adjusting sharpness and colour balance, amongst other edits;
  • remove unwanted and unsightly details using spot healing and cloning;
  • synchronise my images and setting with both my iPad and iPhone Lightroom Mobile apps;
  • export each image or batch of images in virtually any size or dimensions needed. Along with LR/Mogrify 2, it’s easy to add borders, text, additional watermarks, etc. all at the click of a button;
  • print each image or batch of images to exacting sizes, dimensions, and standards with or without borders/margins, watermarks and text notes;
  • create books from within the app to ensure optimal sizing of photographs;
  • save every size, dimension, development process, etc., etc., etc., as a pre-set for repeatable exactness. This has been wonderful for processing, printing and exporting, but also for any repetitive task including managing EXIF and IPTC data.

This really was not meant to be an advertisement for Lightroom Classic or Mobile. After all, this blog started life as an examination of noise in the OM-1. However, with the additional of AI Denoise, it shows Adobe is working behind the scenes to improve their app and stay competitive, even if they are a bit late to the party. Thanks Adobe.

Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe), The Arboretum, University of Guelph, Ontario
OM-1 w/100-400mm ƒ5.0-6.3; ƒ6.3 @ 1/1250; ISO 800; EV-⅔

With last year’s addition of the incredibly helpful AI Masking features and now the DeNoise function, there really is no reason for me to consider shopping around for something better. It can’t be found! Yes, that means I continue to pay the monthly subscription costs for my Adobe Photography suite, but in balance, I think it is now paying off more than ever before.

Don’t take my word for it. Consider watching these videos or reading the article for more info:


Thanks for reading!

If you have any questions or comments about small sensor photography, OM Systems, noise or anything else, please add it to the Comments section below.

If you are not yet a subscriber, then consider adding your email so you are instantly alerted to new blog posts. And I promise not to inundate your inbox.

Have a look at my work by visiting www.luxBorealis.com and consider booking a presentation or workshop for your Photo Club at Workshops.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

OM-1 Field Testing

Monday 10 April 2023

What can I say, other than, “Wow!”

A camera is a tool, allowing me to capture and communicate the world as I see it. I’ve always leaned towards simplicity in my tools, working at the pace of landscapes with tripods. The OM-1 allows this. While there is the pull of exercising all the bells and whistles, I can still dial everything back to a simple viewfinder with simple controls to point, focus, adjust and shoot. That’s my C1 setting with highlight and shadow warnings on. Base ISO of 200. Aperture priority ƒ5.6 to start. AF-S. Single frame silent shutter. But, at the push of a button, I can switch to High Res mode or Focus Stacking, or HDR or Keystone control. At this stage, I just need to remember which mode is mapped to which button. 😊

Forest Ice III, Arboretum, University of Guelph, Ontario
OM-1 w/ M. Zuiko Digital 100-400mm ƒ5.0-6.3 at 123mm; ƒ8 @ 1/250; ISO 200; EV–⅔; Handheld High Res. At shutter speeds like this, HHHR is completely usable – a great tool to add to the box!
Snow Drops (Galanthus), Guelph, Ontario
OM-1 w/ 100/400 ƒ5.0-6.3 at 100mm; ƒ11 @ 1/160; ISO 200; EV-1⅓
This image confirmed two things for me: (1) ƒ11 is completely usable with no sign of diffraction;
(2) I can pull detail out of deep shadows with no loss of quality. Of course, there is always HDR, which I should have tried here. Duh!
Another tool to add to the box – Keystone Control.
Left: No Keystone Control, but the framing I wanted.
Centre: The resulting full-res JPEG with Keystone Control applied.
Right: The full-res RAW file from which the JPEG was created in-camera, so I have the original if I need to change anything. This will be very helpful when travelling and shooting architecture. Having both the JPEG and the RAW is a bonus.

I’ve always considered myself to be “in the know” about photography. During high school, I cut my teeth working in an independent photography store (Connaught Camera in Hamilton, Ontario). My boss, the owner, Jim Prestige, was clear about learning every camera and system inside, outside, upside, downside. He wouldn’t even let me on the selling floor until I could calculate sales tax in my head. “I don’t want you to lose a sale because you’re fumbling over numbers,” he would say.

Nikon, Minolta, Pentax, Ricoh, Konica, Olympus, Contax. But not Leica. Leica was for our ‘Leica Man’ who could sweet talk people out of thousands when the other gear was going for hundreds. And not Canon. “Eddie Blacks carries Canon and I can’t touch their margins,” Jim would say. In the few years I was there, working only weekends and Christmas holidays, I was top in sales twice. The first time was when I sold about a dozen Minoltas in a month. At the time I was using a Minolta XD-11 with some beautiful Minolta lenses. Their 100mm MD macro was top-notch.

The second time was when I sold about a dozen Nikons over Christmas. FMs, FEs, EMs and even an F3. Whoa! Now that was a camera!

But enough history . . .

Those are old systems, long gone, and in retrospect, very simple: Point, focus, adjust, shoot. Photography has come a long way!

I am blown away by the options provided by the OM-1. It’s taking me some time to wrap my head around AF Target, AF Area, and AF Tracking; the advantages of S-AF over C-AF and vice versa; SH1 and SH2; ProCapture; plus all the computational photography options. As I said, “Wow!” For an hour at a time, I immerse myself in learning the ins and outs of one group of settings and options and emerge with a new way of tackling the world of photography.

Right now, it seems overwhelming, but I know this system is cutting edge and it is the future of photography. The beauty of it is that I can still point, focus, adjust and shoot.

Yes, I’m impressed

The engineers behind this camera have built into it a myriad of settings that have become fundamental to landscape, nature and travel photography. And more! And that’s where the real learning begins.

The stabilisation built into the camera and lenses is phenomenal. I’m not yet ready to put away my tripod (I’m looking forward to capturing 80mp landscapes!), but for walkabouts, the stabilisation really is surprising.

Newly-emerged Eastern Garter Snake (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis)
OM-1 w/ 100-400 ƒ5.0-6.3 at 400mm; ƒ11 @ 1/800; ISO1600; EV-1
Amazing! An 800mm field of view hand held shot. A small aperture to increase depth-of-field. No visible noise at ISO 1600. Below: A crop of the same image at 100%.No noise, sharp as a tack, and only 1.3 metres (4 feet) away..
Somebody call an Ambulance!
This photo combines a number of attributes of the OM-1 system.
Having tried the shot handheld at 1.3 seconds at ISO 200 and failing, I upped the ISO to 1600. The next shot was at ⅛ sec, handheld at 100mm (200mm in FF terms), and is perfectly sharp. Moreover there is no discernible noise at ISO1600 despite the poor lighting. In fact, that brings up the third bonus – the white balance and exposure are bang on. This was made under a dim sulphur-yellow bulb in the maintenance yard in Guelph at 6am!

The thing about noise . . .

Have I said how impressed I am with the noise levels? Even better is the fact that all of these photos were processed through Lightroom Classic. It handles OM-1 noise well, but not perfectly. It seems lighting conditions have an effect on noise, beyond what you would expect from simple ISO and exposure. I made a few shots at ISO 1600 where I found the noise at 100% a bit on the salt-and-pepper side. Let me say, though, that In a print, the noise would not at all be noticeable. I’m just pixel-peeping.

However, I knew I should have a look into this noise “issue”. Having heard about the wonders of OM Workspace, I processed the same image through it, only applying the AI Noise Reduction before exporting the image back to LR as a 16-bit TIFF. Thes is the only way I can maintain original quality out of OM Workspace, as it does not produce DNGs.

Guess what? No noise. I mean zero. Yet all the same fine detail is there. Wow!

This is a 200% view of the slightly noisy (remember, this is 200%) LR-produced ORF on the left versus the OM Workspace-produced TIFF of the same file. Okay, okay, I’m being picky here! The full image is below.
Urban Dawn
OM-1 w/ 100-400 ƒ5.0-6.3 at 100mm; ƒ5.6 @ 1/15; ISO 1600

Now for the leap . . .

The area of photography I am now gunning towards is capturing birds. An 800mm fov lens, really opens up the potential for birds in flight and birds in general. I’ve been pleased with the responsiveness of the system. The camera goes from sleep to active in the time it takes me to raise it to eye level. And, its ability to acquire focus (once I’ve set it up properly) is brilliantly fast. The photo below is an example of just this. I heard the geese, raised the camera and fired, taking only a split second to frame the pair. I was in single-shot mode, not prepared for this kind of shot, but still came away with 3 photos. The sun had just risen providing some beautiful lighting.

Early Morning Flight; Canada Geese (Branta canadensis)
OM-1 w/ 100-400 ƒ5.0-6.3 at 100mm; ƒ8 @ 1/400; ISO 200

However, it is the potential offered by Pro Capture that is next on my list. But first, I just need to re-map my brain into a new way of approaching photography using this unique technology. What Pro Capture does is, after half-pressing the shutter release, it begins saving frames. So, when the shutter release is fully pressed, it takes the photo AND it keeps previous frames it had been saving. Not minutes of photos (thank goodness), but rather whatever limit you choose as the photographer; e.g. 50 frames. Tom Stirr has a good article about it as does Espen Helland (who also produces very helpful videos over on YouTube).

Think of a bird on a branch. You half-press the shutter, waiting for it to take off. Once it takes off, you fully depress the shutter and voilà, you have the moment before it took off, the moment it took off and the moment after it took off. Henri Cartier-Bresson would call it cheating, I’m sure, as you no longer need to anticipate the exact decisive moment – Pro Capture does it for you. At least that’s how it works in theory. I’m having trouble wrapping my brain around shooting a millisecond after the decisive moment, when I’m so used to anticipating it. But, as I said in my last post, this old dog can learn new tricks. I can’t say I’ve had great success, the few times I’ve tried it, but my technique is progressing.

Stay tuned!

It’s only a robin, and it’s in a scruffy area in early spring, but it’s a start. Now I just need to get that shutter speed up to ensure the bird is sharp, as well as being more on the ball in following the bird!
OM-1 w/ Zuiko 100-400 ƒ5.0-6.3 at 400mm; ƒ6.3 @ 1/1600; ISO 1600

Thanks for reading! If you have a question, just pop it into the comments below. If you’re enjoying these blogs, I invite you to Subscribe!

To see more of my work, head over to luxBorealis.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

OM-1 First Impressions

Sunday 2 April 2023

There’s been a lot of hype regarding the OM-1. For a glimpse of what I mean, have a look at Andy Rouse’s video: Out and About with the OM Systems OM1. Andy is quite a character and he makes it seem like the OM-1 has magical qualities though, given his extensive skills and dedication, he really is a wizard at bird photography.

As a recap, after weeks of discussions and research, I ordered the Olympus (OM Digital Solutions) OM-1 and lenses. My intent was to purchase from a bricks and mortar store, either Henry’s or Vistek, which are at least somewhat local. However, neither had stock. A quick call to OMDS confirmed they had everything, though with their fulfillment company in the US, I also wanted assurances that I would not pay Canadian import duties, which they confirmed. I placed my order on Monday and received everything Friday.

Full Disclosure: I am, in no way, affiliated with OM Digital Solutions. I am neither a Visionary, nor an Ambassador. In fact, up until two weeks ago, I was shooting full frame and APS-sensor Nikons and a Sony RX-10iii, though, in decades past, I have used both film and digital Olympus cameras and lenses.

First Impressions

I laughed when I saw the 292-page “Basic” manual, thinking, “Whoa, that’s a lot to learn!” But then I realized it included the basics in about 20 different languages. After downloading the PDF manual, I discovered the last laugh was on me, as it is 394 pages. I’m certainly not going to read it cover-to-cover, but will use it as a reference for looking up settings and options on an as-need basis. [Later: The manual is incredibly helpful. Being able to search for and find info about all the settings has been essential.]

What’s in the box(es): I knew there wouldn’t be a battery charger – a poor decision by OMDS, in my opinion. So, pardon me for being surprised to find a wee little hot shoe flash, about the size of my thumb, with bounce capability. What’s with that? Don’t get me wrong; I won’t look a gift horse in the mouth, but why a flash and not a battery charger? No one these days expects a flash with a pro-level camera, but a battery charger–you bet.

And another thing . . . Thanks OMDS for the lens bag for the 12-100 lens (read heavy sarcasm). Considering the 12-100 will be on the camera most of the time, it would have been more useful to have a bag for 100-400. Go figure!

On a positive note, the Fit and Finish is superbly professional in every regard. There is nothing “soft” about this body or the lenses. With no wobbles anywhere, it’s a sturdy piece of kit. Everything ‘clicks’ into place with a reassuring, well, ‘click’, even the lens hoods, which are often the weakest link. When I tap a lens or the camera with a fingernail, there are no hollow-sounding parts. I’ve handled dozens and dozens of cameras over the years and feel of the OM System body and lenses reminds me more of Leica of decades ago, rather than the cameras typical of today.

Viewfinder: OMG, am I looking through a full frame viewfinder? It ‘s big, it’s bright, it’s crisp, and it’s full of info. Best of all, one push of a button turns it all off to concentrate on just the scene, though I do leave on highlight and shadow clipping indicators to prevent blowouts and black holes.

Menus & Settings: Holy decision-making Batman! This is definitely a camera I can grow into. I may need to create one of those quarterback wrist playbooks so my feeble brain can keep it all straight! Thank goodness for the WWW. I found these suggestions particularly helpful for making the most of my limited experience:

By the way, OM Digital Solutions has some excellent free resources for making the most of their systems through their Ambassadors’ site (one of whom is a Canadian – Peter Baumgarten up on Manitoulin Island), and their Learning Centre.

Through reading, watching and working through the menus, plus the guidance Tom Stirr gave me on our Day with Olympus, I managed to make a number of key setting decisions, as well as setting up two Custom modes, one for landscapes and one for birds, and assigning a few buttons for HighRes, Focus Stacking and Keystone correction.

So, I guess you can teach an old dog new tricks!

Trying a few things out: Spring Bouquet
OM-1 w/100-400 ƒ5.0-6.3 @ 300mm; ƒ8 @ ⅕ (handheld); ISO 200
Remember, 300mm on M4/3s is equivalent to 600mm full frame. At ⅕ second, that’s some IBIS at work!

Thoughtfulness

Lens bags and flash/charger aside, I am encouraged by the thoughtfulness that went into the design of the system often, it’s the little things that represent the kind of people behind the equipment. For example:

  • When I select B for Bulb (long exposures), the LCD automatically dims, exactly what you want in a dark situation. And the brightness level for that setting can be adjusted. Now, if only OMDS could display characters in red, that would be perfect. That being said, the remote control on the iPhone app uses red text and graphics, so as not to disrupt night vision.
  • Dial Lock: The main P-A-S-M-B dial has a small push-button lock. Brilliant! For those who don’t want the extra step of releasing the dial, you can always leave it unlocked.
  • Front and Rear Dial Mapping: I’m used to the front dial being used for aperture and the rear dial being used for +/- exposure compensation. Done!
  • WiFi/Bluetooth: Wow!The few times I used the iPhone app for Nikon and Sony, I was surprised at how clunky they were. Reminded me of DOS or early Windows. I really made no use of either.
  • The Olympus app? Easy-peasy. Connected. Saved Custom settings. Upgraded firmware. Uploaded photos to my iPhone. Connected to Live View. Connected to Remote Shutter. My phone is now my cable release. Amazing. It even geotags photos using my phone, though we are warned about battery drain on the phone if left on too long.
Red Squirrel through the kitchen window
OM-1 w/ 100-400mm ƒ5.0-6.3 at 400mm; ƒ6.3 @ 1/60; ISO 200
Both this and the previous photo were downloaded to my iPhone as raw images for instant “sharing” as jpegs. It’s almost as convenient as using the iPhone, but with real” camera quality.

System Size & Weight

For me, this was a major reason for switching from full frame. I was betting on the OM-1 body and three lenses fitting into a LowePro sling bag I’ve had for years – the smaller of the two I have. The bigger one I bought for my full frame gear and it took my D800E, 24-85 walk-around zoom, 20mm, 105 Micro-Nikkor, and my 70-200/2.8. And it was heavy!

Much to my glee, it all fits, including the wee, little flash, a polarizer, a couple of ND filters, and a granola bar. The total package weighs in at 4kg. Hmmm, 9 pounds. Getting heavy . . . but let’s think on that a moment. The 8-25 covers 16-50mm; the 12-100 is a 24-200mm lens; and the 100-400 is equivalent to 200-800mm. So, in a 4kg package, 16mm to 800mm is covered at 20mp (or 50mp with Handheld High Res), near instant AF with excellent tracking up to 120fps, and ProCapture to nail the decisive moment. Not too bad when you consider the superb quality of each lens throughout its zoom range.

Now, all I need to do is get my a** outside a get shooting!

UPDATE: I was out shooting on Sunday in the glaring light of early spring. I will share a few images later this week.

I shot only raw images, so I’ll need to spend some time getting the right processing workflow. My go-to app is Lightroom Classic, but it may not be ideal for .ORF files. I’ve downloaded OM Workspace, but it may not be ideal either, since it only outputs TIFFs for use in Lightroom, and not DNGs. It may be that I turn to Topaz Photo AI or DxO Raw as part of my workflow. I would love to hear your recommendations!

Breaking News!

Aaarrggghhh! Never fails! No sooner do I buy a new computer or camera or whatever, and a newer model is announced. Here’s Peter Forsgård on the new OM-1v. Must Watch! 😉


Thanks for reading. If you have any questions or comments, please join the discussion below. And, if you haven’t yet subscribed – please do so!

Visit my photo galleries at luxBorealis.com and Follow and Like my page on Facebook.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Paradigm Shift

Saturday 25 March 2023

It’s funny how one, brief conversation can turn the world on its head. Okay, maybe I’m being a bit dramatic, but that’s what happened a few weeks ago when one of my Grade 12 Yearbook photographers challenged my beliefs about full frame sensors and camera systems. I mentioned to him that I was considering going mirrorless and getting a Nikon Z8, when it comes out.

I’ve been shooting Nikon full frame for 10 years now and have loved the experience. I clearly remember the absolute joy of adding the D800E to my camera pack. “Finally,” I thought, “I have the quality of 4×5 photography in a digital body.” In the film days, 4×5” negs and trannies were a cut above all else and an image standard I had longed for since the advent of digital systems. With a 36mp Nikon FF body on my tripod, I felt life was complete and I began assembling an appropriate arsenal of FX lenses ranging from 20mm through to the 200-500mm zoom.

Thinking back to the discussion William and I had about the pros and cons of sensor size, I’m surprised at how quickly I drifted into what I now recognize as “full frame arrogance”, as in ”Full frame is better, period,” and, ”Nothing can compare with the versatility and image quality of full frame.” How many times have you heard, ”If you really want to be a professional, you need to be shooting full frame.” William was questioning those beliefs, and had the facts to back up his assertions.

Autumn Explosion, Halliburton, Ontario
Nikon D800E w/ Micro-Nikkor 105mm/2.8; ƒ11 @ 1/50 with Polarising filter; ISO 100; EV–⅔

It’s not like I didn’t know about crop sensors. When I first entered the digital realm, there was no “full frame”. I had great success with Minolta 1:2.3 sensor, followed by Olympus Four Thirds. When FF came on the scene, the pixel count wasn’t anything special (6mp) and the cost was truly outrageous (over $8000). Even after switching to a full frame D800E in 2012, I followed that up with a 24mp Nikon D7200 APS-crop sensor body, specifically to turn my 200-500 into a 300-750mm zoom – ideal for wildlife and birding. So, yes, I knew about crop sensors.

However, my real epiphany with regards to small sensor cameras came earlier and only a few of years after diving into FF. While lugging many kilos of full frame equipment around in the heat of the equatorial Galápagos Islands, I began thinking, “There must be another way.”

Research led me to a new discovery: Sony’s wonder-camera, the RX10III with a 20mp 1” sensor. Amazing! A sharp, fast 24-600mm (equivalent) zoom, complete with raw file output that could comfortably print up to 12×18”. Up until COVID ended all travel, the Sony was with me in Iceland, then back to the Galápagos, then on to Vietnam and to northern Ethiopia. But, despite the amazing photos from that little sensor, I still felt something was missing. So, I entrenched myself back into full frame, continuing to opportunistically capture birds and nature, and my first and true love, landscapes.

Rainbow, Svínafellsjökull, Iceland
Sony RX-10III w/ 7.7-220mm/2.4-4 Zeiss lens @ 127mm (efov); ƒ5.6 @ 1/500; ISO 100

Enter William, who blind-sided me with determined arguments about newer, higher quality sensors, pixel-shift technology, faster and more precise autofocus and, something I hadn’t considered—the vastly improved software interpolation that is part and parcel of the photography experience these days. He capped off his case with the all-important weight and size factors, exactly the reasons why I chose the Sony. It was like he knew my soft spot!

William got me thinking and wondering if there might just be a ‘best of both worlds’ option out there, so I began researching. And my research turned up some interesting points. Bottom line, William was right. My “full frame arrogance” had blinded me into believing that if you really wanted to be professional, you had to shoot full frame. And I was beginning to see why photographers had formed that opinion.

That arrogance came directly from the big three manufacturers: Nikon, Sony, and Canon. None of them take crop sensors seriously, especially with their newer mirrorless offerings. Pros shoot wide angle – where are the wide angle lenses for APS sensor cameras? They all max out at 18mm, the equivalent of 28mm, hardly in the realm of the 24s, 20s or 18s of landscape photography. Pros want fast zooms; there aren’t any for APS cameras. And, more recently, the new mirrorless APS sensor camera lines offer only two “kit lens” zooms – great for snaps, but with glass that does not do their sensors justice. Furthermore, except for Sony, the mirrorless APS sensor bodies are plasticky, have only one card slot, and lack professional-level AF, EVFs, build quality and system integration. Sure you can put FF lenses on the APS sensor bodies, but then you have the bulk and weight of full frame unnecessarily dragging you down. That doesn’t make sense!

Ruby-throated Hummingbird
Nikon D7200 w/ AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm/5.6 @ 500mm (750mm efov); ƒ5.6 @ 1/250; ISO 400; EV–⅔

Basically, the big three were ignoring the potential gains of smaller sensor cameras. They were writing off their own crop sensor cameras as lower-grade consumer items. Even the one glimmer of hope from Nikon, the D500, which is fully professional in every way, has not been ported into mirrorless. So, if the big three were designing crop sensor cameras for consumers, what does that tell you? It told me, there must be another way. Maybe another company was doing it right.

Interestingly, after writing this, I stumbled upon a DP Review article that basically confirmed what my research had already told me. They said Nikon was “making APS-C products for beginners and hobbyists, and full-frame cameras for advanced enthusiasts and professionals”. That was said four years ago, and since then, nothing has changed! The article goes on to say, “there are very few high-quality lens options available for APS-C anywhere, including from third-parties”. Again, this hasn’t changed in the past four years, even with the new push on mirrorless. Sad, really, and it’s all driven by demographics and what they think photographers want. Apparently FujiFilm is thinking outside the box, but even their latest offering is weak on AF and weak on stabilization. Things weren’t looking good.

Adult Cooper’s Hawk, Guelph, ON
Nikon D800E w/ AF-S Nikkor 300mm ƒ4; ƒ4 @ 1/250; ISO 800

Again, I pounded the internet pavement, but this time, I began to notice a pattern emerging. Reading blog after blog and watching dozens of YouTube videos of active professional photographers, all using crop sensor cameras, led me to realize they all had one thing common: these pros were shooting with Olympus Micro Four Thirds.

What?!? This didn’t make sense. Four Thirds sensors are even smaller than APS. How can they be considered professional? I had given up on 4/3s 10 years ago when I adopted Nikon FF. What the hell’s going on here? Yet, here they were, earning a living doing corporate photography, portraits, weddings, bird, nature, wildlife, and landscape photography, all with Micro Four Thirds!

Little did I realize the efforts Olympus had put into building a truly professional system around the Micro Four Thirds (mirrorless four thirds) sensors. Over the years, Olympus has been pouring R&D into creating a sensor and software system that allowed bewildering opportunities in computational photography, integrated with high end AF and stabilization, all housed in a well-built, mirrorless, professional-quality, weather-resistant body that now defies the big boys.

And that’s the Olympus difference. They simply put their minds towards making a crop sensor camera that professionals could trust. More importantly, Olympus created professional quality lenses to support their cameras. And to top it off, their professional-grade gear is half the size, half the weight, and, best of all, half the price of the equivalent full frame gear. Now we’re talking!

Hands down, Olympus has the finest set of glass anywhere for small sensor cameras. In fact, their whole ethos is around creating and maintaining a fully professional small sensor platform, and it’s the way of the future.

When I visited OM Digital Solutions website, I was reminded of the thinking behind Olympus:

“WE ARE THE DARK HORSE.
We don’t run in the race, never have, and never intend to. For over 80 years, we have blazed our own path, pushed the limits of technology, and broken barriers of common convention . . . “

This resonated with me, deeply. It has a hint of Apple’s very successful “Think Different” campaign. Despite the Olympus corporate upheaval of 2020 – Olympus Imaging is now OM Digital Systems – they came out with the most cutting edge professional camera in years with the OM-1. Even that has an Applesque sound to it.

Ansel Adams with his 4×5 camera on the west coast of California in Apple’s Think Different campaign.

Or maybe it’s the mystique of the name, “OM-1” that has grabbed my attention. Back in the film days, I loved the OM-1. Built like a tank, it was lightweight and compact, as were the lenses, and it had some of the best glass in the industry. I went on to own an OM-3 and an OM-4, until everything changed with digital.

So, here I am, going full circle. William’s arguments have won the day. Thank you William! Maybe there’s still hope for us old dogs.

Having started my photography career with an Olympus OM-1, and having worked in 6×7, 4×5, and even my beloved iPhone camera (talk about punching above its weight!!), I’m now coming home again, some 40 years on, to an OM-1 and some of the sharpest glass in the business. Most important to me, though, is the high quality raw imagery I expect from a camera system. Being half the size and half the weight of my FF Nikon gear is also an important consideration, as I’m not getting any younger. The bonus? A fully professional Olympus system will be half the cost of upgrading to Nikon mirrorless. it really is a win-win-win situation.


Thanks for reading. Be sure to subscribe to my blog. You’ll find the Subscribe field by scrolling up to the top right.

If you have any questions about the bog or the photos, please send me an email: terry at luxborealis dot com.

Happy Shooting!

Calico Pennant dragonfly
Nikon D800E w/ AF-S Nikkor 300mm/4.5 and 20mm extension tube; ƒ7.1 @ 1/400; ISO 200; EV–⅔